Run #786
done
rubric v1
session 80561516
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-10-08 18:51
Review team
tutor_issue / pedagogy-issues
Please make sure to address all of the student's doubts. If you are unable to answer any question, ask the student to connect with another tutor rather than skipping the question or ending the session. Also, please do not push students to give a 5-star rating. You can simply ask them to rate the session based on their experience.
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up The whiteboard is oriented upright at 0 degrees.All frames (1-8) show the whiteboard and uploaded image oriented correctly at 0 degrees.
-
Your view
-
seen · 100% confidentWriting is legible at video size The tutor's handwriting is clear and legible.White handwritten text on a dark canvas is clearly readable across frames 4 through 8.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is visible from the beginning.The original question '4 sec^2 A - 4 tan^2 A = ?' is present on the uploaded notebook image visible from Frame 1.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Working progresses linearly and remains on screen.The tutor writes the question, identity, factoring step, and final result sequentially on the right side from Frame 4 to Frame 8 without erasing.
-
Your view
-
seen · 100% confidentIt reaches an answer The problem is fully solved.Frame 8 shows the final completed answer '4(1) = 4' clearly circled.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 38.94% to a peak of 38.94% covered (+0.00 points), ending at 36.78%Effectively nothing was written.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentThe concept is named before the working The identity is written on board but not explicitly named in the spoken transcript.In Frame 5, the identity 'sec^2 theta - tan^2 theta = 1' is boxed, but the transcript does not show the tutor explicitly naming the concept of trigonometric identities.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor moves quickly into writing the formula and solving.The tutor re-states the question and writes the identity directly without prior conceptual setup.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The solution proceeds logically step-by-step.Frames 4 through 8 show progressive steps: stating the identity, factoring out 4, substituting 1, and obtaining 4.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greeted the student and confirmed the problem.The transcript shows the tutor greeting 'Hello Shashi Kumar, welcome to Filo' and confirming the question 'यही question है न तुमारा?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 7s total (4% of the session), longest 7sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual questions were asked to the student.The transcript only contains audio checks ('आवाज आ रही है मेरी?') and question confirmation ('यही question है न तुमारा?'), with no question checking understanding of the math concept.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view