Run #783
done
rubric v1
session 79599635
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up Canvas is upright at 0 degreesText and drawings in frames 1-8 are oriented upright at 0 degrees.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting and diagrams are clear and legibleThe writing ('Hormone', 'Growth Hormone', Hindi script) in frames 3-8 is clearly legible against the dark background.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is clearly visible on screenThe question image is present at the top of the whiteboard in frames 1-7.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Whiteboard content develops in an organized mannerWorking and explanatory diagrams accumulate progressively below the question from frames 3 through 8 without premature clearing.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The question is fully answered and explainedThe core answer ('Hormone') is stated and illustrated with stick-figure growth and secretion diagrams by frame 8.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 11.62% to a peak of 13.68% covered (+2.06 points), ending at 5.66%Very little appeared on the board.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The core concept/answer is explicitly namedThe tutor states 'ये इसको कहते हैं हॉर्मोन.' and writes Hormone / हार्मोन in frame 4.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer Direct answer was given immediately before conceptual breakdownThe tutor states the answer ('हॉर्मोन') right after reading the question before explaining the meaning of endocrine glands and hormones.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Explanation breaks down the terms with visual aidsThe tutor draws growth progression (frames 4-6) and gland secretion flow (frames 7-8) while breaking down the terms.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets the student and reads the questionThe transcript shows the tutor greeting ('Good afternoon bhai, awaaz aarahi hai?') and confirming the question before beginning.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 8s total (5% of the session), longest 8sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No deep conceptual check question was posed to the studentThe tutor explains unilaterally and only asks rhetorical understanding prompts ('you understand what secretion means') without testing the student's conceptual grasp.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view