Run #780
done
rubric v1
session 79460720
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up The document is upright at 0 degreesFrames 1-9 show the application form oriented upright (0 degrees).
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Printed text and digital markings are legibleForm labels such as 'BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD', 'Student's Name', and 'Mother's Name' are readable across frames 1-9.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentThe work fills the frame The form is appropriately sized within the frameFrom Frame 2 onward, the form is zoomed in and clearly visible, despite black space on the right side of the canvas.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentNothing distracting in shot Clean digital workspace with only the form visibleFrames 2-9 display the digital document on a dark canvas with no distracting clutter.
-
Your view
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The registration form is clearly visible from the startFrame 1 shows the entire registration form, and the student's request to fill it is confirmed in the transcript.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Instructions build systematically field by fieldYellow markings progress sequentially down each row of the form across Frames 3 to 9.
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentIt reaches an answer Form sections are systematically guided throughFrames 3-9 show consistent progress through student details, parent details, date of birth, nationality, and category.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written Not applicable to a camera session
-
heard · 85% confidentThe concept is named before the working Task is procedural form-filling rather than a conceptual topicThe tutor states: 'The English language is used in the form of English' and guides through form fields rather than teaching an academic concept.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer General instructions provided before going field by fieldTutor explains the general rule about using block letters/English before guiding specific lines (Frames 3-4).
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Tutor guides through the form step by stepThe tutor guides through each field in order (Student name, Mother's name, Father's name, Nationality, etc.) as seen in Frames 3-9.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greeted student and confirmed the doubtTutor opens with 'Hello Good evening Deepak... What is your doubt?' before the student explains their request.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 6s total (2% of the session), longest 6sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still picture moves 7.2 on average between keyframes, 0.0 hard jumps/minA handheld phone measured 35.1. No steady-camera session has been measured yet, so the lower band is a guess.Not counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
Your view
-
measuredExposure is usable average brightness 117.3, 0.6% of frame very dark, 0.0% blown outBlown-out share is reported but not judged: the subject is white paper, so a good session measures 11-24% there too.Not counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
Your view
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual questions asked to the studentThe transcript shows the tutor lecturing continuously about what to write in each box without asking any check questions.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view