Run #779
done
rubric v1
session 79495210
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up Canvas is uprightAll text and drawings are oriented upright at 0 degrees across Frames 1-8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Writing and diagram are neat and clearly legibleThe drawn cylinder and Hindi handwriting are clearly written and contrast well with the dark canvas (Frames 4-8).
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The student's question is displayed at the top leftThe text box with 'बेलन क्या है और उसके बारे में' is present in the top-left corner across all frames.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Notes and diagram accumulate neatlyThe tutor draws the 3D cylinder on the left and notes down its geometric components (3D, 3 surfaces: 2 circular + 1 curved) systematically on the right (Frames 2-8).
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The conceptual explanation of a cylinder is completedThe tutor completes the basic definition and surface breakdown of the cylinder as shown in Frame 7 and 8.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 3.83% to a peak of 7.52% covered (+3.69 points), ending at 7.52%Very little appeared on the board.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The topic of cylinder (बेलन) is explicitly statedThe tutor identifies the topic immediately, stating 'बेलन एक त्रीवी में आकर्थी है।' in the transcript.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer Conceptual properties are explained alongside visual diagramsThe question is conceptual ('what is a cylinder?'), and the tutor introduces the shape and properties from the beginning.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Explanation proceeds step-by-step from shape to individual surfacesThe tutor methodically draws the cylinder, defines it as a 3D shape, and breaks down the 3 surfaces (Frames 2-7).
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets the student and confirms the questionTranscript begins with 'Good afternoon, Harsh. Welcome to Filo. Okay, आपने लिखा है बेलन क्या है उसके बारे में आपको बताना है. यही आपका question है?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 0 gaps over 6.0s, 0s total (0% of the session), longest 0sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual check question was asked to the studentThe tutor asks 'बेलन में सत्या भी कितनी है।' but immediately answers it himself ('तीन।') without giving the student a chance to answer.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view