Run #778
done
rubric v1
session 79363822
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up Screen orientation is upright at 0 degreesAll text and handwritten notes across frames 1-16 are upright (0 degrees).
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting and typed text are clear and legibleDevanagari script and English terms are neatly written with good contrast against the dark background across frames 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, and 16.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established Questions are written out clearly on the whiteboardThe student requested questions from Biology Chapter 1, and the tutor writes each question on the canvas (e.g., Q1 in Frame 4, Q2 in Frame 5-6, Q4/Q5 in Frame 9, Q7 in Frame 12-13, Q8/Q9 in Frame 15).
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Questions and answers are organized sequentiallyThe tutor systematically presents questions, records answers, and clears the canvas to move to subsequent questions in order (Frames 3-16).
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentIt reaches an answer All attempted quiz questions were completed and verifiedOver 10 chapter-review questions were asked, answered, and evaluated during the session as shown across the frames and transcript.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 5.34% to a peak of 12.2% covered (+6.86 points), ending at 6.42%
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working Topics and biological concepts are explicitly namedThe tutor names the topics, for example stating 'Living world is called Jeev Jagat' and 'Dwi naam padati. Means, binomial nomenclature.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer Format was established before starting the practice quizThe tutor established the student's medium and chapter preferences in the opening before beginning the quiz questions.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Questions are handled methodically one by oneThe tutor presents each question, provides options when needed, lets the student evaluate, and provides feedback on each answer systematically.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets the student and confirms requirementsThe tutor greets with 'Hello student, welcome to the Filo' and checks medium ('Which medium are you from? English or Hindi?') and chapter requirements.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 10 gaps over 6.0s, 90s total (6% of the session), longest 25sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked Active recall and conceptual questions are asked throughoutThe session is structured as an interactive quiz testing concepts like binomial nomenclature, taxonomic hierarchy, and ICBN.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view