Run #777
done
rubric v1
session 79182181
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seenWork is the right way up Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Writing is clear and well-contrasted against the dark canvas.Text in both English and Hindi across frames 2 to 8 is neatly written and easy to read.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is clearly visible in the initial frame.Frame 1 shows the question 'What is coulomb's law' at the top left.
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps The tutor clears the initial diagram to write text instead of keeping both.The diagram in Frame 2 is cleared in Frame 3 to write the text definition across Frames 3 to 8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentIt reaches an answer The session ends before the mathematical formula of Coulomb's Law is written.Frames 7 and 8 only show the verbal statement in Hindi and an incomplete English definition without the mathematical expression.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 2.33% to a peak of 9.98% covered (+7.65 points), ending at 9.98%
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly states the topic at the beginning.The tutor says: 'What is Coulomb's Law? Let's explain to you what Coulomb's Law is.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor sets up the core physical setup before writing the full statement.In Frame 2 and early transcript, the tutor sets up two point charges $q_1, q_2$ separated by distance $r$ before proceeding to write the formal definition.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The definition is built up gradually line by line.Frames 3 through 8 show text being added incrementally alongside spoken explanation.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets the student and confirms the question.In the transcript: 'Good evening, Alshifa. Yes, Alshifa. I will solve your problem. Question is here. What is Coulomb's Law?'
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 0 gaps over 6.0s, 0s total (0% of the session), longest 0sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual check question was posed to the student.The tutor only asks passive check-ins like 'No problem here, no doubt student.'Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view