Run #774
done
rubric v1
session 79240140
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 98% confidentWork is the right way up Canvas and problem orientation is upright at 0 degreesWhile Frame 1 shows a portrait document, from Frame 2 onwards the question and tutor writing are correctly oriented at 0 degrees upright.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting is clear and readableIn Frames 3 to 8, mathematical notation and labels are drawn with clear contrast and adequate spacing on the dark whiteboard.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 98% confidentThe student's problem is established Question is clearly displayed at the top leftQuestion 11(i) ('यदि cos θ = √3/2 तो θ का न्यूनतम धन मान...') is clearly visible in Frames 2–8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Working develops sequentially across the canvasQuadrant layout is established on the right (Frames 2–3) and mathematical deductions follow sequentially on the left (Frames 4–8) without clutter or erasure.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentIt reaches an answer Working reaches the complete solutionIn Frame 8, both relevant angles (30° and 330°) are derived and the minimum positive value (30°) is finalized.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 9.67% to a peak of 24.5% covered (+14.82 points), ending at 18.01%
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentThe concept is named before the working Tutor explicitly mentions quadrant signs and angle valuesThe tutor states: 'What is the positive of your cos theta in which quadrant?' establishing quadrant-based sign rules for trigonometric ratios.
-
Your view
-
heard · 92% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer Concept of quadrant sign was explained prior to algebraic solvingThe tutor sets up the quadrant diagram and explains positive angles in Frames 2–3 before writing out the equation steps in Frame 4.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Solution steps progress systematically with justificationsWork appears stage by stage from Frame 3 to Frame 8, showing intermediate quadrant analysis, standard angle identification, and 4th quadrant angle calculation.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets student and confirms questionTranscript confirms greeting: 'Hello Ankur, good afternoon' and confirms the question: 'Which question do you have doubts about? Cos...'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 0 gaps over 6.0s, 0s total (0% of the session), longest 0sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked Tutor asks conceptually directed questionsThe tutor asks: 'What is the positive of your cos theta in which quadrant?' and 'cos theta, root 3 by 2, in the first quadrant, what cos angle is equal to?'.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view