Run #772
done
rubric v1
session 79141341
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up The canvas is upright at 0 degrees.Text in Frames 1 through 8 is oriented normally at 0 degrees.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting is clear, well-spaced, and easy to read.Handwritten notes like 'physical and', 'non-living', 'Physics chemistry', and 'Living things' across Frames 3 to 8 are clearly legible against the dark background.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is clearly displayed on the canvas.'What is science' is shown in a text box in Frames 1, 2, 3, and 4.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps The working accumulates in a logical branching structure.The tutor breaks down science into physical (non-living: physics, chemistry in Frames 4-6) and natural/life sciences (living things: plants, animals, ecology in Frames 7-8).
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentIt reaches an answer The explanation of the definition and branches of science is completed.By Frame 8 and the end of the transcript, key divisions (physical, living, social sciences) have been outlined.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 1.73% to a peak of 5.88% covered (+4.15 points), ending at 2.71%Very little appeared on the board.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The concept is explicitly named at the beginning.The tutor states: 'So, your doubt is, what is science? See, science में, अगर हम आपको last term में बताई कि science का मतलब क्या होता है, तो science में हम लोग सब चीज़ को combine करके बोलता है.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor begins by introducing the core definition before breaking it down.In the opening of the transcript and Frames 1-4, the tutor introduces science as combining the physical and natural worlds before writing sub-categories.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The explanation progresses step by step through the branches of science.Frames 3 through 8 show progressive categorization from physical/natural to living/non-living and specific disciplines.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greets the student and confirms the topic.Transcript starts with: 'Hello, Ratne. Good morning. Aawa jaa rie, mehli. So, your doubt is, what is science?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 0 gaps over 6.0s, 0s total (0% of the session), longest 0sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked The tutor asks rhetorical questions but answers them directly without checking student understanding.The tutor asks 'आप नेचुरल वर्ल्ड में क्या पढ़ते हो?' and 'Life Sciences का क्या मतलब हुआ?' but immediately answers them in the next sentence without waiting for or receiving student input.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view