Run #770
done
rubric v1
session 79191015
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up The canvas and textbook image are upright at 0 degrees.All frames (1-15) show the textbook page and written notes right side up at 0 degrees.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwritten notes and textbook text are clear and legible.The tutor's handwritten Hindi notes in frames 8-15 and the textbook text across all frames are well-contrasted and readable.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established The textbook chapter being studied is clearly displayed on the screen.Frame 1 shows the textbook chapter 'अध्याय 6 ऊतक (Tissues)' which the student requested to study.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Working and explanations accumulate systematically on the canvas.The tutor underlines relevant lines in the textbook while explaining (frames 2-7) and writes clear summary definitions inside a boxed note area (frames 11-15).
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The theoretical discussion and note-taking are completed.Frames 12-15 show fully written summary definitions and continued explanation through the uploaded pages.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 17.95% to a peak of 48.12% covered (+30.17 points), ending at 11.84%
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly introduces the concept of tissues.In the transcript, the tutor explicitly defines the concept: 'प्रत्यक विशेष कार्य कोशिकावो को विभिन समूद वरा किया जाता है, उसको हम उत्तक कहते हैं.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor thoroughly explains the conceptual background.The tutor explains unicellular vs multicellular organisms and labor division before formalizing definitions in frames 11-15.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The explanation progresses step by step through the text.The tutor walks through the text sequentially, highlighting concepts in frames 2-7 before writing out summary definitions in frames 11-15.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greets the student and confirms their goal.The transcript starts with: 'Hello, good evening, welcome to Filo.' and the tutor confirms what the student wants to cover: 'इसमें आपका क्या डाउट है?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 2 gaps over 6.0s, 18s total (2% of the session), longest 10sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked The tutor asks a conceptual question to check understanding.The transcript shows the tutor asking: 'पोधे गती करते हैं नहीं करते हैं?' and the student affirms with 'G.G.'Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view