Run #769
done
rubric v1
session 79393183
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 98% confidentWork is the right way up The camera view is upside down (180 degrees rotated)Across frames 3 to 8, the writing on the notepad is completely upside down (180 degrees) from the student's perspective.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting is neat and legibleText defining restriction enzymes ('प्रतिबंधन एंजाइम') and their two types in frames 4-8 is clear and readable despite the inverted orientation.
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentThe work fills the frame Camera shifts and frames 1 and 9 are severely cut offFrames 1 and 9 show only a narrow sliver of the page against a dark background, while frames 3-8 capture the page along with background table surface.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentNothing distracting in shot Workspace is clean with minor background itemsFrames 3-8 show a floral desk surface and a box edge, but nothing disruptive to the session.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The topic is stated and written at the startThe topic 'प्रतिबंधन एंजाइम' (Restriction Enzymes) is visible in frame 1 and written at the top of the page in frame 3.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Notes build progressively line by lineFrames 3 to 8 show notes developing logically from definition to function to classification.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The topic explanation is brought to completionFrame 8 shows the finished notes covering the definition and two enzyme types before the tutor concludes.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written Not applicable to a camera session
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly names the topic at the beginningThe tutor states: 'आपको प्रतिबंधन इंजान देखना है, right?' referring to restriction enzymes.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor introduces and explains the concept immediatelyThe tutor starts by explaining the definition of restriction enzymes as molecular scissors in frame 3.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Explanation follows a clear step-by-step progressionWorking progresses sequentially from what restriction enzymes are to how they cut DNA and their two main types in frames 3-8.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greets the student and confirms the topicThe tutor starts with 'Hello, Gulb sir. Good morning, Gulb sir. आपको प्रतिबंधन इंजान देखना है, right?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 6s total (2% of the session), longest 6sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still picture moves 31.2 on average between keyframes, 0.7 hard jumps/minConsistent with the camera being handheld — a stand would remove this entirely. A handheld phone measured 35.1. No steady-camera session has been measured yet, so the lower band is a guess.Not counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
Your view
-
measuredExposure is usable average brightness 107.8, 17.2% of frame very dark, 0.2% blown outBlown-out share is reported but not judged: the subject is white paper, so a good session measures 11-24% there too.Not counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
Your view
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual understanding check was conductedThe transcript shows only a confirmation of the topic ('right?') without any conceptual questions asked to the student.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view