Run #767
done
rubric v1
session 79481033
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seenWork is the right way up Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting and mathematical notation are clear and easy to read.In frames 2-9, the Hindi text and mathematical expressions (0 = 0/2 = 0/5 = p/q) are written clearly with good contrast on the dark canvas.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is prominently placed and legible across the top of the whiteboard.In frames 2-9, the printed Hindi question regarding whether zero is a rational number is clearly displayed across the top banner.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps The whiteboard is systematically organized without clutter or erasures.Frames 2 to 6 show logical progression: the main conclusion is written first, followed by fractional examples on the left and condition checks (p=0, q≠0) on the right.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentIt reaches an answer The solution and explanation are fully completed.By frame 6 (and continuing through frame 9), all parts of the question are verified, concluding with p=0, q≠0, and a checkmark.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 4.92% to a peak of 23.04% covered (+18.11 points), ending at 23.04%
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly states the mathematical concept being addressed.The tutor explicitly references rational numbers in the transcript: 'सुन्ये एक परिमे संख्या है?' and writes 'शून्य एक परिमेय संख्या है' in frames 3-9.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor immediately gives the direct answer before explaining the underlying reasoning.In the transcript, right after reading the question, the tutor states 'पहला बात क्या करतो अंसर हो गया? है.' and immediately writes the affirmative answer in frames 2-3.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The explanation methodically breaks down the definition of a rational number.Frames 3 through 6 show the step-by-step demonstration of representing 0 as 0/2, 0/5, etc., and verifying both integer and non-zero denominator conditions.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greets the student and reads the question before starting.The transcript shows the tutor starting with 'Good morning student... Nikhil, आवा जा रही है? कैसे हैं?' and reading out the question.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 4 gaps over 6.0s, 54s total (22% of the session), longest 26sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked The tutor does not ask the student any conceptual questions to check understanding.The tutor poses rhetorical questions and immediately answers them ('क्यों है? क्योंकि सुन्ये को हम क्या लिख सकते हैं?'), giving no opportunity for the student to explain or demonstrate understanding.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view