Run #765
done
rubric v1
session 79483006
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up Canvas and image orientation is upright at 0 degrees.All frames (Frame 1 through 8) are displayed upright at 0 degrees.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting and diagrams are clear and easily readable.Frames 2 to 4 show clear, well-spaced handwriting in yellow and blue, and Frames 5 to 8 show neat, multi-colored diagramming.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established Question is captured at the very beginning.Frame 1 shows a clear image of the handwritten question about the principle and working of a moving coil galvanometer.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Content progresses logically from principle to diagram construction.Frames 2-4 introduce definitions, principle, and formula, followed by a dedicated construction diagram in Frames 5-8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The session ends mid-explanation while describing the diagram.Frame 8 and the end of the transcript show the tutor still explaining the construction and angle between vectors, leaving the complete working and the second sub-question unfinished.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 18.67% to a peak of 18.67% covered (+0.00 points), ending at 4.96%Effectively nothing was written.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The core concept and principle are explicitly stated.The tutor states: 'when a current carrying coil is placed in a uniform magnetic field, the coil experiences a torque' (supported in Frame 3 and transcript).
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor introduces the purpose and principle before moving to detailed construction.In the initial transcript and Frames 2-4, the tutor discusses what a galvanometer is and its underlying principle before drawing the setup in Frame 5.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The explanation follows a structured step-by-step path.The tutor proceeds step-by-step from purpose -> principle -> formula -> construction diagram across Frames 2 through 8.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly Tutor greets the student and reads the question.The transcript starts with: 'Hello, I am Sikha Singh. Good morning.' followed by reading out the question.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 18 gaps over 6.0s, 225s total (37% of the session), longest 36sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked The tutor does not ask conceptual questions to check student understanding.Throughout the transcript, the tutor lectures continuously without asking any questions requiring the student to demonstrate understanding.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view