Run #764
done
rubric v1
session 79434690
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 95% confidentWork is the right way up Canvas and handwritten working are upright.The tutor's whiteboard notes, diagram, and mathematical equations are oriented at 0 degrees across Frames 2 to 8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size The handwriting is clear, neatly color-coded, and easily readable.In Frames 2–8, the diagram, Hindi annotations, and mathematical proof equations are well-spaced with high contrast against the dark background.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The theorem image is clearly displayed at the top of the canvas.The statement of Thales Theorem / Basic Proportionality Theorem is visible at the top of the canvas in Frames 1–5.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps The mathematical proof is laid out logically in columns.Left side contains given/to prove, construction, and first ratio (Frames 2–5), while the right side contains the second area ratio and conclusion (Frames 5–8).
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The proof is completed by the end of the session.Frame 8 shows the full proof showing equality of areas and equating ratios to conclude the theorem.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 11.32% to a peak of 12.62% covered (+1.30 points), ending at 6.09%Very little appeared on the board.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor identifies the theorem being proved.The tutor names the theorem (transcribed as 'This is your cell serum' for Thales Theorem) and it is labeled as 'थेल्स प्रमेय' on the problem image.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor clearly defines what is given, to prove, and the construction before calculating areas.In Frames 2 and 3, given conditions, 'सिद्ध करना है', and construction lines are written and highlighted before calculating areas in Frame 4.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The theorem is proved step-by-step with visual annotations.Frames 3–8 demonstrate step-by-step progression: constructing perpendiculars, calculating areas of respective triangles, taking ratios, and concluding.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor warmly greets the student and confirms language before starting.Transcript opens with 'Hello, Welcome to Filo. What language are you speaking? Hindi or English? Hindi. Okay, okay.'
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 5 gaps over 6.0s, 42s total (11% of the session), longest 13sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked Only comprehension check phrases were asked without probing conceptual questions.The tutor asks superficial questions like 'कोई दिक्कत समस्या' and 'Any problem?' throughout the transcript rather than checking conceptual understanding.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view