Run #763
done
rubric v1
session 79221414
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seenWork is the right way up Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting is neat, well-sized, and easy to read against the dark background.In frames 2 through 8, all written equations, numbers, and text annotations are clear, appropriately sized, and have strong contrast.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The problem statement is clearly displayed at the top of the whiteboard.While frame 1 shows the image rotated sideways, frame 2 onwards shows the printed question text upright and fully readable at the top of the screen.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Work is neatly organized and moves logically between stages.Frames 2-3 list given quantities and unit conversions, frames 4-5 show the average speed formula and arithmetic calculation to find 36.6 km/h, and frame 7 shows the underlying distance breakdown.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentIt reaches an answer The problem is completely solved with a final numerical answer.Frame 5 and Frame 8 show the completed calculation yielding 36.6 km/h.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 3.98% to a peak of 9.62% covered (+5.63 points), ending at 3.92%
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly names the concept of average speed.The tutor states in the transcript: 'find the average speed of the cart' and 'Average speed is equal to V1 into T1 plus V2 into T2 upon T1 plus T2'.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor moves directly into data listing and solving rather than pre-explaining the core concepts.Immediately after reading the question prompt, the tutor begins listing variables (v1, t1, v2, t2) and converting units in Frame 2 and 3.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The tutor works through the solution methodically step by step.Frames 3 to 5 show the progression from listing the parameters to setting up the weighted average formula and executing the simplification step by step.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor greets the student by name and confirms the question before starting.The transcript starts with 'Hello Bintu Kumar. Yes Sir, tell me. Can you hear me?' and confirms the question before proceeding.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 12s total (3% of the session), longest 12sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked Checks are mostly rhetorical or basic recall rather than deep conceptual probes.The tutor asks 'आवर में चेंज करोगे तो क्या करोगे?' and 'If you want to calculate the average speed, then what is the formula?', but immediately continues without an identifiable student response.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view