Run #762
done
rubric v1
session 79564907
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seenWork is the right way up Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size The handwritten text is neat and clear against the dark canvas.In Frames 6 to 8, the tutor writes clearly in Hindi script using high-contrast pink ink on a dark background.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The question is clearly captured and visible from the start.Frames 1–4 clearly show the handwritten question in the student's notebook: 'पेट्रोल में क्या - क्या मिला होता है?'.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps The written answer develops logically in sequential order.In Frames 6, 7, and 8, the explanation is written line by line without overwriting or disorganization.
-
Your view
-
seen · 85% confidentIt reaches an answer The written definition stops mid-word in the final frame.In Frame 8, the board ends mid-word at 'हाइड्रो' while the transcript abruptly closes with closing remarks.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 29.91% to a peak of 57.03% covered (+27.13 points), ending at 14.55%
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor clearly names the relevant chemical concepts.The transcript shows the tutor stating concepts such as crude oil fractional distillation ('कच्चे तेल प्रभाजी आसवन') and hydrocarbon mixture ('Hydrocarbon is a liquid mixture').
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor verbally explains the components before writing down notes.Frames 1–5 contain no whiteboard writing while the tutor verbally explains crude oil refining, hydrocarbons, and ethanol blending before beginning to write in Frame 6.
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap The explanation progresses step by step from origin to additives.The tutor methodically explains fractional distillation of crude oil, hydrocarbon formation, and ethanol additives, gradually writing down the summary across Frames 6–8.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor provides a polite greeting and confirms the question.The transcript begins with: 'Hello Ranveer Prasad, Good afternoon, Welcome to the Filo. Petrol में क्या क्या मिला होता है? यह आपको जानना है न?'.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 1 gaps over 6.0s, 6s total (2% of the session), longest 6sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No conceptual check question was asked to test understanding.The tutor only asks procedural/understanding checks ('Do you understand?', 'Do I have to write the definition of this?') rather than a conceptual question requiring the student to think.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view