Run #761

done rubric v1 session 79324984 gemini-3.7-flash 2026-09-21 02:21

What the student sent the question as it arrived, then each reading of it

OCR of the image GOOGLE_VISION

Pat 30/7/20 * 5) 4 कोशिका किसे कहते है कोशिका को जीवन की मौलिक एव जीवन की संरचनालाक एव इकाई कहा जाता है कोशिका का खोज → रॉबट हुक ने पहली बार 1665 खोजा था। (कॉर्क) यह मृत कोशिका का खोज' * एंटोनी वान हंयुतेनहाक 1674 ई0 → यह जीवित कोशिका का खोज → तालाब के पानी में सरख सुक्ष्म उपयोग करके जीवित कोशिका: जैसे:- (बैक्टीरिया, और प्रोटोना करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति थ 10. 90

The phone's own reading, which differs:

30W/7 সककाक कशकाकी, जीतन त सलिम जीतन की रचনানা एG এकা কहा जा। को शिका का ২নाনে -ল हुक न पहली 6াर1KS ীলা ই্ |(कोक) 8 मत Gাটিका নका 2 সनी ाना रूथनहाकবप 0 ভथह जीति कोशका का शोष ভানালাণ कै पून ी২হ আ उपशीण কহके जीविर क हाक ি (oटीरूघा, আर प्रीरीना करन तল e থান

The audit's reading of the question, which is what the Product AI judged against:

Audit's summary: The student asked a question about cells, and the tutor explained the discovery of cells by Robert Hooke and Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. The tutor clarified the difference between dead and living cells and the methods used by each scientist. The tutor also checked for the student's understanding and addressed any doubts.

Transcript 455 characters · 150 stripped

Read it no speaker labels — tutor and student run together

Hello, good afternoon, Ashfa, welcome to Filo. इस समझाना है अश्पाँ 1674 B.C. they have also found these cells but they have found the living cells. Where did they do it? In the water of the pond, they have found the living cells by using simple and small drugs. Like bacteria, protozoa, all these. So what was in the person? Did you understand Asfand? Yes. What are the doubts? Yes. Okay. Okay. Now, no doubt about you? No. Okay. Bye. Okay. Bye. Bye. Bye.

What the student sent the question as it arrived, then each reading of it

OCR of the image GOOGLE_VISION

The phone's own reading, which differs:

The audit's reading of the question, which is what the Product AI judged against:

Transcript 455 characters · 150 stripped

Read it no speaker labels — tutor and student run together

Review team

no_issue

Product AI

nothing found

teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes

Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.

Work is the right way up Orientation is upright at 0 degrees.

All frames (1-8) show the uploaded notes upright at 0 degrees rotation.

seen · 100% confident
Your view
Writing is legible at video size The handwritten text is clearly readable.

The Hindi handwritten notes regarding cell biology and its discovery are clearly legible across frames 1 to 8.

seen · 95% confident
Your view
The work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session

seen
Nothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session

seen
The student's problem is established The notes/questions are visible on the canvas from the start.

Frame 1 shows the uploaded page containing questions and notes on cell discovery.

seen · 95% confident
Your view
Work proceeds in followable steps Working and annotations progress systematically down the page.

The tutor underlines and circles relevant points sequentially from Frame 3 to Frame 8.

seen · 90% confident
Your view
It reaches an answer The explanation of the presented points was completed.

The tutor highlighted the relevant points through frame 8 and concluded the discussion with the student.

seen · 90% confident
Your view
Something was actually written board went from 17.95% to a peak of 44.38% covered (+26.42 points), ending at 23.96%

measured
Your view
The concept is named before the working The tutor mentions living cell discovery directly without a formal conceptual introduction.

The transcript shows the tutor diving straight into: '1674 B.C. they have also found these cells but they have found the living cells.'

heard · 85% confident
Your view
Explained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor explains the notes line by line.

The tutor explains the historical discovery of living cells as presented in the notes right from the start of the interaction.

heard · 85% confident
Your view
Solved step by step, not in one leap Explanation moves step by step through the points.

The tutor steps through the details (discovery year, organism, pond water) systematically while annotating in frames 3-8.

heard · 90% confident
Your view
The session opens properly The tutor greets the student warmly at the start.

The transcript records: 'Hello, good afternoon, Ashfa, welcome to Filo.'

heard · 95% confident
Your view
No long dead air 2 gaps over 6.0s, 13s total (8% of the session), longest 7s

Silence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.

measured
Your view

Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting

The camera holds still Not applicable to a board session

Not counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.

measured
Exposure is usable Not applicable to a board session

Not counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.

measured
Understanding of the concept is checked No conceptual check question was asked.

The tutor only asked generic understanding checks like 'Did you understand Asfand?' and 'What are the doubts?' without testing conceptual comprehension.

Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.

heard
Your view

What the model returned verbatim

{
  "findings": [
    {
      "key": "orientation",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "Orientation is upright at 0 degrees.",
      "evidence": "All frames (1-8) show the uploaded notes upright at 0 degrees rotation.",
      "confidence": 1.0
    },
    {
      "key": "legibility",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "The handwritten text is clearly readable.",
      "evidence": "The Hindi handwritten notes regarding cell biology and its discovery are clearly legible across frames 1 to 8.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    {
      "key": "question_captured",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "The notes/questions are visible on the canvas from the start.",
      "evidence": "Frame 1 shows the uploaded page containing questions and notes on cell discovery.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    {
      "key": "structure",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "Working and annotations progress systematically down the page.",
      "evidence": "The tutor underlines and circles relevant points sequentially from Frame 3 to Frame 8.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "key": "completion",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "The explanation of the presented points was completed.",
      "evidence": "The tutor highlighted the relevant points through frame 8 and concluded the discussion with the student.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "key": "concept_named",
      "verdict": "weak",
      "headline": "The tutor mentions living cell discovery directly without a formal conceptual introduction.",
      "evidence": "The transcript shows the tutor diving straight into: '1674 B.C. they have also found these cells but they have found the living cells.'",
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    {
      "key": "explained_before_solving",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "The tutor explains the notes line by line.",
      "evidence": "The tutor explains the historical discovery of living cells as presented in the notes right from the start of the interaction.",
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    {
      "key": "concept_checked",
      "verdict": "bad",
      "headline": "No conceptual check question was asked.",
      "evidence": "The tutor only asked generic understanding checks like 'Did you understand Asfand?' and 'What are the doubts?' without testing conceptual comprehension.",
      "confidence": 0.95
    },
    {
      "key": "step_by_step",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "Explanation moves step by step through the points.",
      "evidence": "The tutor steps through the details (discovery year, organism, pond water) systematically while annotating in frames 3-8.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "key": "opening",
      "verdict": "ok",
      "headline": "The tutor greets the student warmly at the start.",
      "evidence": "The transcript records: 'Hello, good afternoon, Ashfa, welcome to Filo.'",
      "confidence": 0.95
    }
  ]
}

Duration	167s (2.8 min)
Video	1280×800 @ 10.0fps
Audio track	yes
Shot changes
Dead air	2 gaps ≥6.0s · 13.0s total · longest 7.0s
Luma	avg 74.7 · min · max
Medium	board 66.4% flat background
Content written	17.95% → 23.96% (+26.42)
Transcript	455 characters of speech
Frames	8

Run #761

The recording

What the student sent the question as it arrived, then each reading of it

Transcript 455 characters · 150 stripped

What the student sent the question as it arrived, then each reading of it

Transcript 455 characters · 150 stripped

Review team

Product AI

Measured

What the model returned verbatim

Frames in order, one every ~21s