Run #760
done
rubric v1
session 79225239
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 100% confidentWork is the right way up Orientation is upright at 0 degrees.Writing and question image are displayed upright across all frames (Frames 1-9).
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Board writing is clean, large, and legible.Handwritten math notation in Hindi and English is clearly visible against the dark canvas (Frames 5, 6, 7, 9).
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 100% confidentThe student's problem is established Question image is clearly visible from the beginning.The AP question '4, 2, 0, -2...' is visible in Frames 1, 2, 3, and 6.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Explanations progress linearly with clear notes.The tutor introduces general AP terms, common difference (Frame 5-6), and then the nth term formula (Frame 9).
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentIt reaches an answer The problem is not solved by the end of the session.Frame 9 stops at the general formula tn = a + (n-1)d without calculating the requested next 4 terms of the sequence.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 8.52% to a peak of 20.5% covered (+11.98 points), ending at 1.68%
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly introduces Arithmetic Progression (AP).The tutor states: 'See, what does AP mean? Arithmetic progression. What does arithmetic progression mean? What is it called? Samanttar Shrini.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The tutor dedicates the session to explaining foundational concepts before working on the problem.Throughout Frames 4-9 and the transcript, the tutor explains the definition of AP, common difference, and general terms before solving the specific question.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Concepts are built up in parts, but the specific question is not stepped through.The tutor develops the concept step by step (Frames 5-9), but does not complete the steps to find the next 4 terms of the given AP.
-
Your view
-
heard · 100% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor warmly greets the student and confirms the question.Transcript opens with 'Hello, Ansika Rao, very good evening. Yes, Ansika, tell me what is happening?' and confirms receipt of the question.
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 2 gaps over 6.0s, 32s total (11% of the session), longest 25sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked Concept checks are mostly rhetorical or followed up by the tutor answering themselves.The tutor asks 'And what is D? Where D is? Sarvayantar. What is it? Sarvayantar. Tell me. Is it clear? Or not? Tell me.' without waiting for deep conceptual reasoning from the student.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view