Run #759
done
rubric v1
session 79314950
gemini-3.7-flash
2026-09-21 02:21
Review team
no_issue
Product AI
nothing found
teaching Yes · mistakes No · satisfactory Yes
Each verdict takes your own. Yours is stored against the stack's, so “where is it wrong most often” is a question with an answer.
-
seen · 95% confidentWork is the right way up The canvas and question image are upright.Frame 1 starts rotated 180 degrees, but the tutor quickly corrects it to 0 degrees by Frame 2 and it remains upright for the rest of the session.
-
Your view
-
seen · 95% confidentWriting is legible at video size Handwriting on the canvas is clear and legible.In Frame 8, the Devanagari text 'एकसमान चाल -> त्वरण (शून्य)' is written neatly in high-contrast green ink on the dark canvas.
-
Your view
-
seenThe work fills the frame Not applicable to a board session
-
seenNothing distracting in shot Not applicable to a board session
-
seen · 95% confidentThe student's problem is established The textbook problem is clearly captured on screen.The Hindi textbook problem 5.1/5.2 is visibly displayed starting from Frame 2 through Frame 8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentWork proceeds in followable steps Whiteboard work is structured alongside the question.The tutor places diagrams and relevant definitions clearly on the left side of the whiteboard next to the problem in Frames 6–8.
-
Your view
-
seen · 90% confidentIt reaches an answer The session terminates while only part (a) is being explained.Frame 8 and the transcript cut off midway through explaining part (a) with Newton's second law, leaving remaining sub-parts unaddressed.
-
Your view
-
measuredSomething was actually written board went from 12.84% to a peak of 57.38% covered (+44.53 points), ending at 31.61%
-
Your view
-
heard · 90% confidentThe concept is named before the working The tutor explicitly mentions acceleration and Newton's second law.The tutor states: 'Which means that the term of acceleration is zero... So according to Newton's second law, a formula is obtained.'
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentExplained rather than jumped to the answer The core concept of uniform speed and zero acceleration is set up before calculation.The tutor explains that constant speed implies zero acceleration before applying Newton's second law to find the net force.
-
Your view
-
heard · 85% confidentSolved step by step, not in one leap Working progresses logically through the physical principles.The tutor relates uniform velocity to zero acceleration first (Frames 6–8) before transitioning to force calculation via Newton's law.
-
Your view
-
heard · 95% confidentThe session opens properly The tutor exchanges greetings and confirms the question number.The transcript starts with 'Hello. Yes, sir. Good morning... Sir, this question is... 5.1 or 5.2 is the number. Okay.'
-
Your view
-
measuredNo long dead air 2 gaps over 6.0s, 16s total (13% of the session), longest 8sSilence is below -35.0dB — a crude measure on a phone microphone, so treat a low count as weak evidence rather than proof the tutor was talking.
-
Your view
Observations judged, but not counted as the lab objecting
-
measuredThe camera holds still Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Measured over 183 known-bad and 29 known-good camera sessions (2026-09-21): raised on 87% of the bad and 86% of the good, and the motion distributions are the same shape — median frame difference 25 on the bad set, 27 on the good. No threshold on this number separates them, so it is reported and not counted.
-
measuredExposure is usable Not applicable to a board sessionNot counted: Same two sets: it raised 6 of 183 known-bad and 2 of 29 known-good sessions. Both too few to mean anything, and the brightness distributions overlap almost exactly. The earlier reading that it 'fires more on clean sessions' was two sessions out of twenty-nine — noise, not an inverted rule.
-
heardUnderstanding of the concept is checked No deep conceptual check question was posed to the student.The tutor only asks a rhetorical tag question: 'एक समान चार मतलब constant speed होती है न' without asking an open conceptual question requiring student problem-solving.Not counted: Raised on 87% of known-bad and 80% of known-good sessions. The criterion is honest about why in its own `why`: the transcript has no speaker labels, so a real check and a rhetorical 'ok?' are often indistinguishable, and the bar ends up one almost no session clears. Still judged and shown, because reading it beside a recording is how it gets better.
-
Your view